Around Bingley there used to be, and possibly there still is, a strong belief in the existence of fairies.
In Gilstead Crags there was an opening in the rocks known as "Fairies Hole", and it was said that the tiny
creatures used to trip and dance and play their merry antics in the bright moonlight. Anyone who
intruded at such a time, it was said would lose their sight. At Harden, in a secluded part of Deep Cliff, it is said that the fairies could sometimes be
heard clanging musical tongs and what looked like tiny white garments hung out on the trees could be seen
on bright nights. "Chronicles & Stories of Bingley and District by Harry Speight- 1904"
In 1916/17 Frances Griffiths and Elsie Wright, two young girls living in Cottingley, produced the most famous fairy pictures in Britain
which are still talked about today.
The first photograph was taken in July 1917 and showed Frances with the fairies.
Frances and Elsie had been teased about their story of seeing fairies near Cottingley Beck.
Elsie borrowed her father's quarter plate camera ,which he set to 1/50s at f/11 for her,
and after some rudimentary instruction on how to operate it, she went off with Frances into the area where the beck ran among the trees
behind the family home. An hour later they returned triumphant.
When Mr. Arthur Wright (one of the earliest qualified electrical engineers),
and Elsie went into the dark room that evening to develop the plate, there were the fairies.
Arthur asked what those bits of paper were doing on the picture?
The second photograph of the gnome resulted in the girls being banned from borrowing the camera
again. The photographs were put away by Mr. Wright in a drawer as he considered them to be
pranks. (Mrs. Wright was convinced of their authenticity.)
In 1918 Frances wrote to her friend Johanna Parvin in South Africa and enclosed a copy of the photograph.
On the back of the photo she had written 'Elsie and I are friendly with the beck fairies. Funny, I never
used to see them in Africa. It must be too hot for them there. The letter from Frances ran thus:
'. . . all think the war will be over in a few days, we are going to get our flags to hang up in
our bedroom. I am sending you two photos, both of me, one is me in a bathing costume in our back
yard, uncle Arthur took that, while the other is me with some fairies up the beck, Elsie took
that one. Rosebud is as fat as ever and I have made her some new clothes. How are Teddy and dolly?'
In her letter to Johanna, Frances was more
interested in talking about the war and her dolls and the photo with the fairies was given but scant
and matter of fact reporting. As if seeing fairies was to her an every day occurrence of little importance.
Three years later Mrs Wright went to a folklore lecture in Bradford with a friend.
This lecture included references to fairies and following the lecture in conversation with her friend
mentioned the fairy pictures. They were overheard by a friend of Edward Gardner, a leading theosophist,
and Edward asked to see them.
Fred Barlow, a leading authority on psychic photography, commented to Gardner in June 1920 -
'I am inclined to think, in the absence of more detailed particulars, that the photograph showing
the four dancing fairies is not what it is claimed to be....' and in December 1920 - 'I am
returning herewith the three fairy photographs you very kindly loaned to me, and have no hesitation
in announcing them as the most wonderful and interesting results I have ever seen.'
Gardner sought a photographer who had the ability to examine the photographs fully and so it
was that Harold Snelling came to his notice. He was informed that 'What Snelling doesn't know
about faked photographs isn't worth knowing.' Snelling's considered judgement, in his letter to Edward Gardner of July 31 1920, was 'These two negatives are entirely genuine
unfaked photographs of single exposure, open-air work, show movement in all the fairy figures,
and there is no trace whatever of studio work involving card or paper models, dark backgrounds,
painted figures, etc. In my opinion, they are both straight untouched pictures.'
Mr. Gardner asked Snelling to make contact positives and two lantern slides of the photographs.
These lantern slides were shown by him at a lantern lecture at Mortimer Halls, London. Through this
the photographs came to the notice of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle.
On hearing of Mr. Snelling's opinion, it was proposed, and agreed, that if the negatives survived
a second expert's judgment, preferably Kodak's, then Edward Gardner and Conan Doyle should join
forces and make the photographs a leading feature in the Strand article. Accordingly an
appointment was made with Kodak's manager. They were
received by Mr. West, the manager. His studio chief and two
other expert photographers were also present. The negatives were examined by all
at some length, and the results of the inspection were as follows, all agreeing.
(1) The negatives are single exposure.
(2) The plates show no sign of being faked work, but that cannot be taken as conclusive evidence
of genuineness.
(3) Kodak's were not willing to give any certificate concerning them because photography lent
itself to a multitude of processes, and some clever operator might have made them artificially.
(4) The studio chief added that he thought the photographs might have been made by using the glen
features and the girl as a background; then enlarging prints from these and painting in the figures;
then taking half-plate and finally quarter-plate snaps, suitably lighted. All this, he agreed,
would be clever work and take time.
(5) A remark made by one was that 'after all, as
fairies couldn't be true, the photographs must have been faked somehow.'
They came from Kodak's without a certificate. It was decided there and
then that one of them would go to Yorkshire, interview the family in their home environment.
Edward Gardner then travelled to Cottingley and spoke to Mrs. Wright and Elsie, who answered his questions
willingly and candidly. He spoke separately to Mr. Wright later the same day and found him to be of forthright
speech and character and having a cheerful disposition. Mr Wright told Mr. Gardner that he had been so convinced
at the time that the figures must be made of paper or something like paper, that while the children
were out he searched their bedroom for some sign and he also searched the glen and waterfall. But in neither the house nor the glen
did he find anything. Mr. Wright agreed to the Strand publication as long as proper names were not used.
Sir Arthur had wished to make some monetary payment for this but Mr. Wright very firmly declined,
saying that if the photographs were genuine they shouldn't be soiled by being paid for!
In 1920 The Strand magazine published an article entitled ";An Epoch Making Event - Fairies Photographed";,
(the publication sold out within days), and so began a
controversy which raged on the the following sixty-three years.
The articles in The Strand: The Absolute Proof. November 1920, Vol. 60, pp. 439 - 445.
December 1920, Vol. 60, pp. 463 - 468. Doyle's acceptance and publication of pictures showing young girls photographed with fairies caused a sensation and great controversy.
March 1921, Vol. 61, pp. 199 - 206. More pictures attempting to prove the genuineness of fairies.- Fairies Photographed.
The Cottingley Fairies. February 1923, Vol. 65, p. 105- The Evidence for Fairies.
In 1921 Conan Doyle arranged for Geoffrey Hodson, a medium, to come to Cottingley, sit with the girls,
in the hope that even stronger shapes would materialize. In August 1921 Mr Hodson reported seeing
wood elves under some beech trees as well as dancing fairies in the field. These incidents are reported in his book 'Fairies
at Work and Play'. He also states in his book 'I am personally convinced of the bona fides of the
two girls who took these photographs. I spent some weeks with them and their family, and became
assured of the genuineness of their clairvoyance, of the presence of fairies, exactly like those
photographed, in the glen at Cottingly(sic), and of the complete honesty of all parties concerned.'
Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, of Sherlock Holmes fame, was entirely convinced by the photographs
and to demonstrate his unshakeable belief in the spirit world, he published The Coming of the Fairies
in 1922. It recounted the story of the photographs, their supposed provenance, and the implications of their existence.
Frances moved to Scarborough in the 1920's and Elsie worked at several jobs mainly with an artistic background.
Elsie eventually emigrated to the USA where she met her husband Frank Hill. They moved to India and lived there until 1949.
They then settled back in England in the Midlands with their son and daughter.
Frances married a soldier in 1928 - Sydney Way - and after many postings overseas finally settled in
Ramsgate.
Over the years Elsie stated constantly that, although the fairies were wonderful, she needed to try
to forget all about them. She said that down the years she got fed up of talking about them.
Elsie and Frances remained tight-lipped until 17th February 1983 when Elsie admitted
in a letter of confession that the photographs were a hoax, claiming
that they had drawn the fairies, cut them out and fastened them to the ground with hatpins. So that was that!
Or was it? The mystery still lives on with many people still believing that the Cottingley fairies existed. Frances maintained in her
last television appearance in 1986 that 'there were fairies at Cottingley'.
Elsie died in April 1988 and Frances died in July 1986. They gave us a story that has stood the test
of time and has done no harm to anyone. It may be that the real hoax was 'the confession', made in the hope that they could
spare their families from the press, and that
somewhere in the spirit world they are both having the 'last' laugh.
Even today these photographs continue to mystify and fascinate the world. All this with the first photograph that a young
girl took.
In 1990 Joe Cooper's book ";The Case of the Cottingley Fairies"; was published. He investigated the whole story and Colin Wilson in
the foreword to the book states that it is ";as near as we shall ever come to the complex truth behind the case of the Cottingley Fairies";.
A Warner Bros Film ";Fairy Tale - A True Story"; held its British premiere in Bradford in 1998 which tells the story of Frances and Elsie.
Frances was born 1907 and following the fairy affair returned to South Africa. She always maintained
that at least one of the photos was not fake. She died in 1986.
Elsie was born 1900. Due to
hounding by the English press following the fairy story, she went to America, married and eventually
returned to Britain. She died in 1988 at the age of 88.
Sir Arthur Conan Doyle (1859-1930) died on 7th July 1930
Edward Gardner died in 1970 at the age of 100.
Geoffey Hodson born 12.3.1886 died at age 96 on 23rd January 1983
In the 1980's a former wrestler (Ronnie Bennett) and then forester in
Cottingley Woods, admitted to having seen fairies in the woods. He claimed he saw the elf-like figures
while working in the Cottingley Estate Woods. "When they showed themselves about nine years ago there was a slight drizzle around. I saw
three fairies in the woods and I have never seen them since. They were just about ten inches tall and just stared at me.
There is no way the Cottingley Fairies is a hoax."
Geoffrey Crawley tells his personal story of the longest running photography hoax
carried out by two Yorkshire schoolgirls in the
British Journal of Photography.5/1/2000. Unfortunately this article is no longer available on line. A transcript is available for perusal at the
Cottingley Town Hall Heritage Day
In 1972 Stewart Sanderson of Leeds University persuaded Leslie Gardner (son of E. L. Gardner) to
donate Cottingley Fairy correspondence and the five glass plates of the fairies to the
Brotherton Collection at Leeds University, where they are still housed. (1972 was 50 years after the first publication of the fairies photos). It is understood that E. L. Gardner
persuaded the Wright family to sign over copyright of the photos to him when he took away the original plates.
In 1998 Geoffrey Crawley's collection of Cottingley Fairy Photographs, two of the cameras used by the girls, 3 sketches by Elsie
of Cottingley Fairies, a letter from Elsie to Geoffrey Crawley (1988) and a book 'The Coming
of the Fairies' by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle (1st Edition 1922) were purchased by public subscription and
are held at the National Media Museum at Bradford. These are all available to be viewed and there are frequent
gallery talks about them. The cameras etc and a reproduction of one of the photographs are on
display in their Kodak Gallery on the history of popular photography. The photographs themselves are housed in Insight - their Collections and Research Centre and anyone
who wishes to is welcome to make an appointment to go and see them. This can be done via their website:
(www.nationalmediamuseum.org.uk/Collections/Insight.asp)
or by getting in touch in person. Copies of these photographs held at SSPL are subject to reproductive copyright
July 16th 1998 Frances' collection of a boxed set of 37 glass slides of the fairy pictures,
together with a signed first edition of Conan Doyle's book "The Coming of the Fairies",
were auctioned by Sothebys and were purchased by a London bookseller for £21,620. Both lots were sold on to private buyers in America.
(See Reference 1 and
Reference 2 )
In 2001, An 84-year old photographic archive relating to the celebrated Cottingley Fairies hoax fetched £6,000
at auction.
The collection of glass plates and other negatives, was bought
by an unnamed buyer at the Bonhams & Brooks auction in London's Knightsbridge.
The archive consisted of master copies of the original photographs along with a three-page
commentary by Gardner, who commissioned photography experts to prove that the pictures were not faked.
It included previously unpublished pictures of Elsie and Frances holding hands and posing with Arthur
and Polly Wright.
Gardner had passed this collection on to the British Theosophical Society, from where they were
handed down to a series of owners until their present owner (reportedly Hodson) put them up for sale.
The only known surviving contact print from the original Arthur Wright negative (unfortunately very
frail and not in very good condition) is owned by J. Mawson.
Original copies of the photographs were on sale in the late 1990's at a
photography gallery in Massachusetts. They were reputed to come from Edward Gardner's collection.
The copy mentioned is mounted on a heavy/stiff brown paper
with set type stating "D. Fairy offering flowers to Iris. Copyright. Photograph taken August 1920."
The measurements are : Mount: 20.5cm high x 15.3 cm wide. Image: 15.5 high
x 11.5 wide. I am grateful to John L Rossetti for this information
Photo on heavy brown paper with set type stating B. IRIS AND THE GNOME Copyright. Photo taken 1917.
This photo in A Reed's posession.
Mount is 19.1 cm high and 14 cm wide.
Photo is 15.5 cm high and 11 cm wide. The original owner of this photo was a personal friend
of E.L.Gardner
Other copies which were given to friends by Elsie and Frances remain in private ownership.
It is not known how many of these still exist. (I am aware of 3) If you know of any more please email
1914 - Princess Mary's Gift Book from which it is alleged Elsie took inspiration for her fairy drawings
1922 - The Coming of the Fairies - Arthur Conan Doyle
1925 - Fairies at work and play - Geoffrey Hodson
1945 - A book of real fairies: The Cottingley photographs and their sequel - Edward L Gardner
1990 - The case of the Cottingley Fairies - Joe Cooper
1982 - Flim Flam - James Randi (Cottingley Fairies among other phenomena)
South Wales Argus - November 1920 - 'The day we kill our Santa Claus with our statistics we shall have plunged
a glorious world into deepest darkness' and a Welsh proverb was quoted 'Tis true as the fairy tales told in books.' Yorkshire Post - 6 December 1920 - The Curious case of the Cottingley fairies Truth Periodical - January 1921 - 'For the true explanation of these fairy photographs what is wanted
is not a knowledge of occult phenomena but a knowledge of children.' City News - January 1921 - 'It seems at this point that we must either believe in the almost incredible
mystery of the fairy or in the almost incredible wonders of faked photographs.' Westminster Gazette 12th & 21st January 1921 - No flaw has been found in the Cottingley Fairy story. Cape Argus 25th November 1922 - Cape Town link in world controversy - startling sequel to an Argus article - remarkable
letter in support of Sir A. C. Doyle. (5 column article followed including the following paragraph
'The plain fact surely is that, however sceptical you may be about the existence of fairies,
the production of this letter written by Frances Griffiths, a former Cape Town girl, to Johanna
Parvin, at Woodstock, in November 1918, is a valuable piece of evidence in support of
Sir A. C. Doyle's story. And for this reason. It was not until 1920 that this photograph
began to attract attention. Yet for two years before Sir Arthur had seen this photograph,
a similar photograph had been lying at Woodstock, Cape Town, sent from one girl friend to
another with far less comment than was displayed in writing about their several dolls! . . .
Isn't the very intimate and insignificant detail of it, the very off-hand manner in which
a world phenomenon is dismissed in a couple of lines - isn't all this the best kind of evidence
possible that, two years before Conan Doyle ever started this controversy, Frances Griffiths
believed implicitly in the existence of fairies: so implicitly indeed as to discuss them with
no more surprise or emphasis than she discussed her dad, her dolls, and the war? '
Folklore Volume 84 1973 - Article by Stewart Sanderson 'The Cottingley Fairy Photographs: A Re-Appraisal
of the Evidence'
Folklore Volume 86 1975 - Article by Leslie Gardner - Notes on Mr S F Sanderson's Presidential Address,
21 March 1973,
on 'The Cottingley Fairy Photographs' Cottingley Photos - Winged Ufonauts - by Robert Sheaffer 1977 'The Skeptic'
If the images were cut outs of either paper or card how were they disposed of without anyone noticing?
Wouldn't Elsie's father have searched high and low for any clues?
Cut outs would leave mutilated magazines or remnants from paper drawings - why were none found?
Surely it would be difficult for children to make sure all traces were disposed of without anyone noticing.
Pictures cut out of paper or card always show the white edge of the paper - anyone practising decoupage knows this
How were the wings made transparent?
Why didn't the hat pins show through paper or thin card?
Is it believable that all the photos were taken without any hitches? It would be difficult to
get rid of any "mistakes" with the type of plates and film used at that time.
In his book "The Coming of the Fairies" Conan Doyle states at the end of Chapter 3- "It may be added
that in the course of exhibiting these photographs (in the interests of the Theosophical bodies
with which Mr. Gardner is connected), it has sometimes occurred that the plates have been
enormously magnified upon the screen. In one instance, at Wakefield, the powerful lantern used
threw an exceptionally large picture on a huge sheet. The operator, a very intelligent man who
had taken a sceptical attitude, was entirely converted to the truth of the photographs, for,
as he pointed out, such an enlargement would show the least trace of a scissors irregularity
or of any artificial detail, and would make it absurd to suppose that a dummy figure could
remain undetected. The lines were always beautifully fine and unbroken."
Click on
Watercolours to see recent paintings "Where Fairytales Begin" Courtesy of Mrs. V. Youell. and "The Cottingley Fairies" by Terry Saglibene of New York.
Your comments and/or suggestions are
welcome please sign the Cottingley Connect
Guest Book ~~~~~~~~
For more information contact
This electronic mail address must be treated as confidential and may not be transferred to any other person or organisation in accordance with the 1998 Data Protection Act.